Summary
The council discussed accelerating the LCP with the Coastal Commission, possibly producing a framework by May 26. Surfider and residents pushed the city to complete the LCP and abandon support for AB 1740, which would exempt many coastal developments from Coastal Commission review.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 9, 2026.
Impact analysis
The city has reportedly spent $400,000 in public funds on the LCP application to date.
Completing the LCP would give the city local control over most coastal permits while keeping Coastal Act protections.
Critics of AB 1740 fear loss of Coastal Commission oversight could expose public views, low-cost accommodations and coastal access.
Mentions & discussions (2)
June 9 - Jun 9, 2026
A wave of surfers, students, Surfrider and Heal the Bay urged the council to withdraw its support and co-sponsorship of AB 1740, which they say creates Coastal Act exemptions that could harm beaches and public access. The council took no action during this meeting.
May 12 - May 12, 2026
The council discussed accelerating the LCP with the Coastal Commission, possibly producing a framework by May 26. Surfider and residents pushed the city to complete the LCP and abandon support for AB 1740, which would exempt many coastal developments from Coastal Commission review.
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Santa Monica
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.